Mike Zhou is a recognised expert in machine learning and artificial intelligence, renowned for his ability to design intelligent systems that lead to business success. With a strong education in mathematics, engineering, and data science, Mike has led pioneering AI initiatives, including the development of the most advanced customer-focused AI solution in the accounts receivable management industry. His leadership style is centred around constructing world-class data science teams, fostering collaboration between technical and business stakeholders, and ensuring that AI-driven insights drive real outcomes.
In this interview, Mike shares his approach to building and growing data science teams, combining technical expertise with business acumen, and creating a culture of experimentation and innovation. Mike offers insightful advice for leaders in the evolving landscape of data-driven decision-making, from the key characteristics he looks for in high-performing talent to strategies for aligning AI efforts with broader company goals.
When assembling a data science team, one must pay attention to certain qualities that balance technical acumen with business insight. Intellectual horsepower is a critical quality which has become more important with the emergence of Artificial Intelligence solutions. While it is true that numerous people possess data science know-how, not everyone can solve unknown problems with finesse. Additionally, relentless curiosity is a trait sought after in candidates, as it often correlates with achieving exceptional results through innovative methods, particularly in the research-driven field of data science.
Lastly, while not every team member needs to excel in storytelling, having a mix of individuals who can effectively communicate complex concepts and advocate for data science is crucial for fostering collaboration and enhancing the visibility of their work
Check out AllInsider’s impactful Guide to Powerful Data Science Tools (2025 Edition), and learn about which data science tools are best for your business.
Across different positions throughout his career, he has had experience working in settings where data scientists worked autonomously and also in teams or squads or even tribes. The best structure varies greatly depending on the context. Leadership and management, as well as individual contributors, must all share a common understanding of objectives. He has also noted the success of coordinating both monetary and non-monetary incentives so that commercial and technical teams collaborate towards getting the best out of their organisation.
Depending on the level of technical staff’s influence on commercial results, it might be advisable to coordinate their incentive schemes with those of commercial stakeholders. In addition, the creation of cross-functional teams is important, asking members from all departments to perceive themselves as an overall team toward a common aim.
Processes are often overlooked, especially by technical development groups that tend to bypass the definition of processes and documentation while stuck in the building. But it is important to implement the right processes first before the team increases rapidly. There have been observations that small teams can work quite well, but start to have difficulty with efficiency once they become bigger. It is also necessary to balance the amount of time spent on infrastructure setup and process.
As a general rule, it is best to bring new members into the team only after pertinent processes are put in place, so they can work effectively without depending on the specific expertise of a few of the initial team members. This gap in knowledge and different working styles can impede scaled teams from reaching their potential. Having processes for new team members to adhere to can help them become integrated into the operational rhythm of the team. Furthermore, leadership structure is important in this scenario as well.
A clear leadership structure is key to successfully scaling a high-performing team. It is ideal to recruit line managers with high levels of expertise in their discipline. Managers who exist as project coordinators without technical skill or experience to lead the team tend to be less productive than those who possess a technical background and experience in innovation. Whenever possible, internal candidates are prepared for management positions.